Vanilla 1 is no longer supported or maintained. If you need a copy, you can get it here.
HackerOne users: Testing against this community violates our program's Terms of Service and will result in your bounty being denied.

JQSmoothJump

This discussion is related to the JQSmoothJump addon.
adrian.adrian.
edited September 2007 in Vanilla 1.0 Help
JQSmoothJump

Comments

  • Excellent add-on! Works a charm!
  • Hmmm... Doesn't seem to work on mine. Seems to be FireFox.

    Also even in IE it doesn't work in comments, just the all discussion page.
  • Does nothing for me I'm afraid but then neither did the regular SmoothPageJump. pic

    Posted: Wednesday, 5 September 2007 at 4:49PM

  • <grumble>__MACOSX .DS_Store</grumble>
  • <wanderer>Stupid PC Mentality...</wanderer> sidenote: I at least disabled polluting network shares with ds store files by using onyx!
  • I tried making this very extension myself, but didn't manage to squash some bugs... I'll give this a go later :)
  • I noticed if you have the JQMedia extension enabled the smooth page jumps don't come into effect for some reason. Probably a clash. JQMedia doesn't work for me at the moment with YouTube videos so I have it disabled anyway. Just something I found. :)
  • JQMedia doesn't seem to work with this extension anyways. I had both activated and the videos where not showing, once it was disabled the videos showed.

    This was with JQMedia 0.5.1, not the latest version(0.5.1a or something).
  • hmmmm, they probably both use document.ready not really sure how to get round that stash? anyone?
  • you can use $(document).ready as many times as you want. multiple calls do not conflict, they all fire when the DOM is ready.
  • really? awesome, I figured the last defined one would overwrite all previous ones.
  • yep... reference: http://www.learningjquery.com/2006/09/multiple-document-ready
  • itchy's right - it's one of the big pulls for using jQuery :) I havne't got time to look into this just yet as I'm changing jobs (8 day week this week). If no one's figured it out by the time I have some time I'll take a look.
This discussion has been closed.