Vanilla 1 is no longer supported or maintained. If you need a copy, you can get it here.
HackerOne users: Testing against this community violates our program's Terms of Service and will result in your bounty being denied.
Tagging (of sorts)
If anyone is familiar with the YayHooray catagorisation system, this would be a great help as you will probably be familiar with what I am talking about.
I like the YH catagorisation system, as it is a cross between subcatagories and tagging (it supports both). I always use the discussion list as the default view and I prefer the way that vanilla is discussion oriented and not catagory oriented, BUT, with the varying content on MY forum I NEED to be able to sort/ filter by catagory as sometimes I can't view things at work or school, etc.
Basically, the YH system works like this: (one example)
Meaningless <-- Top Level Catagory (selected from predetermined list)
-- Too Hot For The Internet <-- Sub Catagory (selected from predetermined list)
-- NSFW
-- Stupid
-- Offensive
-- Really Stupid
-- Other <-- Sub Catagory (displays an input box for user input, i.e. a tag)
I don't have the understanding of the framework to create this, but this is something that I would love to see.
I like the YH catagorisation system, as it is a cross between subcatagories and tagging (it supports both). I always use the discussion list as the default view and I prefer the way that vanilla is discussion oriented and not catagory oriented, BUT, with the varying content on MY forum I NEED to be able to sort/ filter by catagory as sometimes I can't view things at work or school, etc.
Basically, the YH system works like this: (one example)
Meaningless <-- Top Level Catagory (selected from predetermined list)
-- Too Hot For The Internet <-- Sub Catagory (selected from predetermined list)
-- NSFW
-- Stupid
-- Offensive
-- Really Stupid
-- Other <-- Sub Catagory (displays an input box for user input, i.e. a tag)
I don't have the understanding of the framework to create this, but this is something that I would love to see.
0
This discussion has been closed.