Vanilla 1 is no longer supported or maintained. If you need a copy, you can get it here.
HackerOne users: Testing against this community violates our program's Terms of Service and will result in your bounty being denied.

Filebrowser on Mac OS X Server WOES.

edited November 2006 in Vanilla 1.0 Help
So I have a client who needs thumbnailing working. File browser works ok with PHP4.4 on Mac OS X 10.4 server. but no GD support. I install PHP5 on a different box, and it loads the page as garbage code (php5.2) I install PHP4.3 on another box Filebrower works but still no thumbnailing. But PHP info says yes GD support with JPG. What am I missing here?

Comments

  • For php5 support i think all you have to do is change the opening php tags (<?) to proper ones (<?php)
    As for why it wont thumbnail with GD support...no idea i'm afraid. How big are the images? Have you tried thumbnailing other formats?
  • I had done the <?php for the server with PHP5.2 server no dice. On the php4.3 server that the phpinfo page says has GD support (with JPEG Suppor) They are like 4 meg files. The one gives an error is only a 2.65m file. Error Message: An error occurred while attempting to copy the source image "FILENAME.JPG". Your version of php (4.3.11) may not have jpeg support. Affected Elements: Thumbnailer.GenerateThumbnail(); The permissions for the dirs right now are 777 with root/admin as the owner. Should they be different. Is it really a permissions issue instead of lack of graphic support?
  • Actually the PHP5 was the simple fix. I had too different web share folders there.
  • On the PHP5 server now working it doesn't return the error. It just hangs there. Could it be a permissions thing or has anyone seen this?
  • 4meg is pretty big for a jpeg...try something like 50kb to see if that works for a starter.
  • I'm running 10.4 server on my dev box, which php5 package did you install?
  • My problem with the PHP5 is thumbnailer is still not working on this machine. It just goes to the White Screen with no error output.
This discussion has been closed.