Vanilla 1 is no longer supported or maintained. If you need a copy, you can get it here.
HackerOne users: Testing against this community violates our program's Terms of Service and will result in your bounty being denied.
Signatures 1.01 making XHTML invalid?
Yesterday I tried to validate our site inkscape-forum.de. The validator complained about a pair of tags in the header just right beside the Login link.
<b></b>
After doing some further research, I found out it's a matter of the signatures extension. Studying the code revealed this passage (line 37 - 42) to me.$Context->AddToDelegate('Menu', 'PreHeadRender', 'NoFunc');
function NoFunc(&$F)
{
echo('<b></b>');
}
Why do you need these empty tags in the header? What's it good for? Anyone here that has installed this extension and could test this behaviour? 0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Did you misunderstand my comment? It wasn't meant offending in any way. English is not my mother tongue. So if I've said s.th that can be misunderstood, I want of course to apologize for it. I don't need it. I could as well comment out the line
$Context->AddToDelegate('Menu', 'PreHeadRender', 'NoFunc');
I proposed it only because I don't know if this would break the extension. I'm not good at PHP.btw. I'm no strict and unforgiving person . I even thought about not posting this issue. But then I remembered Mark's words about the lack of feedback. (8000 downloads but only 1000 users in the community) and thought why not posting this issue within the signatures extension. Maybe it's of any help to someone.
I'm not even keen on validity. I just made a test for the fun of it. And that's where I discovered this
<b><b/>
thing.I removed it meanwhile and everything works well.