Vanilla 1 is no longer supported or maintained. If you need a copy, you can get it here.
HackerOne users: Testing against this community violates our program's Terms of Service and will result in your bounty being denied.
Site Content Ownership
I would appreciate your comments on site content ownership. I have a forum member that was recently banned, now they want me to remove all posts made by them as he claims they are intellectual property. I contend that they are posts made to a public forum and by deleting them they will disrupt the community pages. Over 2600 posts they made.....and the member is threatening attorney's and law suits. I don't think he has a case at all.....but I am interested to find out if any of you have had to deal with this issue and what your thoughts are. Unfortunately my TOS don't specifically address this and this forum is not a vanilla forum.....I appreciate your thoughts. Thanks.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
I suppose I'm saying "I told you so" to them, not you, which does not help your case much I guess.
Logic and reasonable thinking suggests that you are correct, he freely contributed his comments to a public forum which he now has no right to retract, especially since he has been banned.
Assuming you are able to back yourself that you had a right to ban him and the reason is fair and acceptable, I think you are safe.
Posted: Thursday, 1 March 2007 at 4:57PM (AEDT)
Re: Case in question
Did they a) actually send a letter by a lawyer, or have they b) just threatened you?
If a) then I'd ask a lawyer, not this forum, or if you're not willing to spend the
buckaroos consider removing the content, or, what I've done in the past,
STRIKE OUT the content... as a sign of good faith (e.g. this is not here)
If b) then I'd play the game and say YOU'VE spoken with a lawyer who told you they
had no leg to stand on (I'd really speak with a lawyer though, just so you can
reference a conversation and CC that lawyer on your emails to him/her)
You may even throw in a couple of case references AND state for the record
that you will make them pay for your lawyers fees if they decide to proceed.
Note: if the official request is to remove the content, then any lawsuit demanding
removal becomes moot as soon as you actually remove it. You could always use it
as a fall-back position in situation (b).
I would be interested to see the TOS the user in question agreed to.
Do you have a link (don't post them here in case the other party google's for them)
Final remark: my guess is sometimes you WANT content ownership, and sometimes
you don't.
T
PS I am *not* a lawyer, but also not scared of them due to past experiences.
PPS Interesting issue: if he/she was QUOTED in responses, then does that content
still belong to them, or not?
Thanks for your feedback. While I have no intentions at this time of deleting the persons posts what this has done is brought to my attention the need for a better TOS to cover these issues. My TOS mentions personal information such as email, name, etc and what could happen if they do something wrong or objectionable.
You see I read somewhere that "all content posted to a forum then becomes the property of the forum owner" and I "ASSUMED" that this was correct. My Mistake.
This is what my standard TOS says: So in reading this you might see that this TOS says nothing about content ownership or use of the content by the site owner.
And if you had to delete all their posts just imagine how that would affect the continuity of the threads... or discussions (with two s's )
Here is the Vanilla standard TOS:
FWIW, mine states: Not a word about content ownership... :-(