Blog Documentation Book a Demo
Vanilla 1 is no longer supported or maintained. If you need a copy, you can get it here.
HackerOne users: Testing against this community violates our program's Terms of Service and will result in your bounty being denied.

Repeatedly Sign In's

2»

Comments

  • lechlech ✭
    yeah, it was bugging me too, so I spent half the night messing with the options and looking into stuff. This should hopefully clear up issues with textpattern and other apps running on your servers that share the same cookie.
  • MiGMiG
    Any news on this topic?
  • lechlech ✭
    mark's got it fixed apparently for the next release, sit tight :D
  • MiGMiG
    Okellidokelli thanks for the info :)
  • stomptokyostomptokyo
    Excellent!
  • nathannathan
    Are releases still going to be fortnightly? I think Mark was trying to get them out that quickly. Anything to think otherwise?
  • lechlech ✭
    I think this is going to be one of those "big-ass" fixes that makes or breaks it before the big 1.0 if I interpretted marks earlier comments this week correctly.
  • nathannathan
    Does that answer my question? Forgive me, but I am not sure. Is that a yes, they will be release fortnightly, if all goes to plan? I am glad this issue is fixed though.
  • lechlech ✭
    define what you mean by "fortnightly" if you mean one every other day/week, then no. But then again, im not one who an honestly answer that kind of question, that's marks dept.
  • nathannathan
    well, fortnightly means (in Aus anyway) bi-monthly. every two weeks. I would no expect it to come out every second night. wow. poor mark. I also understand you are in no position to tell me for sure, but is it still planned this way? (I did find a thread, lost it now, where mark said he aimed for a release every two weeks. not major ones, just bug fixes.)
  • lechlech ✭
    hehe, I wouldn't count on nor expect it as Vanilla for mark is a freetime project, obviously. I'll accept "when it's ready" as a proper release time. Although a schedule of every 2 weeks nailing down the big bugs wouldn't be too bad. Not that I'm asking for it, as long as it's not super-critical where it forces me to discontinue use of Vanilla, I don't mind how long it takes if i can enjoy what's already in there to mess with :)
  • nathannathan
    I agree with you. If I need a problem fixed, I will ask mark for the change and do it myself. Most changes are explained (solved) here, so it is not hard and I often won't have a need to contact mark, or the problem solver directly.
  • MarkMark Vanilla Staff
    The current codebase is very unstable. I've only had a few hours here and there to work on it, so it's pretty far from complete. I will definitely need to set up another version of vanilla for Q/A, and no - it won't be fortnightly. I don't have a timeframe in mind at the moment :/
  • nathannathan
    thanks for clearing that up.
  • MarkMark Vanilla Staff
    I wish it could be fortnightly. I just don't have that kind of time right now.
  • dknowlesdknowles
    mark, would you accept patches if i were to start fixing some bugs?
  • MarkMark Vanilla Staff
    Well, I actually have been tearing apart the application's configuration settings, so there's no way to patch right now without a complete overwrite. I've literally changed code in every file of vanilla right now.
  • dknowlesdknowles
    yikes. extension writing it is, then. =)
  • jonezyjonezy New
    see that's why you need subversion1!!!
  • MarkMark Vanilla Staff
    I know - this discussion about subversion is going on in a bunch of different threads.

    I'd set it up, but I don't have a clue how. Someone want to hold my hand through this one? Let's take this SVN discussion over here
This discussion has been closed.