Vanilla 1 is no longer supported or maintained. If you need a copy, you can get it here.
HackerOne users: Testing against this community violates our program's Terms of Service and will result in your bounty being denied.
[in progress] social-blog
The plan:
A multi blog extention or even changes to the core, the profile page will end up the actual "blog" for the user, I hope we can get it in the future to allow each user to have there own plugins.
as of this moment I have made the core changes that allow the profile to be the blog, I am now going to start work on the photo uploads/albums.
still alot to be done tho, including a properly working "friends" system, and messaging.
I am also looking to find a way to properly connect installs to each other securly to allow site admins to select if they want there own community or join there site to a much larger comunity.
If anyone wants to join in this effort just let me know, for right now its:
- atomicshockwave (me)
- timfire
A multi blog extention or even changes to the core, the profile page will end up the actual "blog" for the user, I hope we can get it in the future to allow each user to have there own plugins.
as of this moment I have made the core changes that allow the profile to be the blog, I am now going to start work on the photo uploads/albums.
still alot to be done tho, including a properly working "friends" system, and messaging.
I am also looking to find a way to properly connect installs to each other securly to allow site admins to select if they want there own community or join there site to a much larger comunity.
If anyone wants to join in this effort just let me know, for right now its:
- atomicshockwave (me)
- timfire
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Here below is my mail reply:
just my two cents. take it for what it's worth.
You could also create a filter for singling out an individual member's blog (since linking the "blog" category will bring up all blogs from all members).
- Every member has a their own blog that others can comment on;
- Or, every member has their own blog that ONLY they can comment on (their own private discussion).
I was assuming the former. Note the distinction between commenting on existing discussions (which anyone could do) and opening new blog-discussions (which only the blog owner should be able to do). My proposed scheme basically makes cosmetic changes and creates pseudo-categories based on who wrote the opening post. So even though it would technically be the same category, if I wrote a new discussion it would be displayed as "timfire's blog", while any new discussions posted by you would be displayed as "atomicshockwave's blog". It would be impossible for me to post a new discussion in your "atomicshockwave's blog" pseudo-category, and vice versa. (Note that you could also, potentially, display or change other "blog"-specific data as well.)One issue with my scheme, though, is that permission to comment on blogs would still be category-wide. So if Mark, for example, had permission to comment on "timfire's blog", he would also be able to comment on "atomicshockwave's blog" as well. There's no easy way around that (though it could be done).
The pain comes with the various interfaces. You have to create a form for applying for membership, some sort of system for detecting applications, and another form for approving applicants. And you have to create some sort of system for users who just want an open blog where anyone can comment. It's doable, but a lot of work.