Vanilla vs. Kareha: which is better for your users?
Here is a quick comparison between Vanilla and Kareha ( http://wakaba.c3.cx/ ). My opinion, in seven points. Feel free to point out logcial mistaeks or start a lively flamewar.
When can a user start posting? What effect does this have on the popularity of your forum?
Vanilla: A user cannot start posting immediately. He must wait for administrator approval. More likely, he will be annoyed by the hassle of registration and forget about posting.
Kareha: A user may post as soon as he reads a thread. There is no wait and no need for registration. The quick reply field practically invites discussion.How "exclusive" is the forum?
Vanilla: Tries to entice new users with "Did you know that there is a whole world of functionality you're not seeing? ... If you don't have an account, you can apply for one now." In short, pretends to be an fancy resort in the Bahamas when it is really just an Internet forum. Additionally, the "quick PM" feature encourages forming cliques among users.
Kareha: Shows you the posts and gives you a box to reply in. No illusions that might encourage haughtiness or cliques. You are just someone chatting, not a "member".How secure is a user's identity?
Vanilla: A user must stick to a single identity. If someone wishes to stalk him they have access to all his posts.
Kareha: A user may give anything as her name, verify her identity with a simple tripcode, or use no identity at all. If someone wishes to stalk her they will soon have second thoughts.How do you start a thread?
Vanilla: How, indeed? (alright, this is just a stylesheet issue...)
Kareha: Fill out a subject and post right on the front page.What sort of people will come to your forum?
Vanilla: Only the people who are lifeless enough to go through the whole registration process despite the waste of time, and then bored enough to come back to the forum when their registration is actually approved.
Kareha: Anyone with knowledge or an opinion to share.How prone is the board to trolling? What sort of /identities/ will come to your forum?
Vanilla: "Fora with only registered accounts are like a garden full of flowers of vanity a troll would just love to pick." --some guy
Kareha: "If there is a user ID attached to a user, a discussion tends to become a criticizing game. On the other hand, under the anonymous system, even though your opinion/information is criticized, you don't know with whom to be upset. Also with a user ID, those who participate in the site for a long time tend to have authority, and it becomes difficult for a user to disagree with them. Under a perfectly anonymous system, you can say, 'it's boring,' if it is actually boring. All information is treated equally; only an accurate argument will work." --the administrator of the largest Internet forum in the world, 2chHow easy is it to read threads?
Vanilla: The same as any other damn forum. How is Vanilla all that different from phpBB, anyway?
Kareha: You can read the threads right on the category page.
Comments
Oh and the admin-aproval of users can be turned off.
How easy is it to read threads?
Vanilla: The same as any other damn forum. How is Vanilla all that different from phpBB, anyway?
Not really. You have a front category page on phpBB and IPB. In Vanilla you just have a list of threads. Pretty big difference.
Also, to be honest without being rude, I just checked out these other forums you were speaking of, and it confused the heck out of me. The interface isn't intuitive at all, imo.
And quite honestly, I'd rather have registration, PMs, etc, because IT BUILDS A COMMUNITY. That's what forums are for. If I just want to chat and goof around, I'll use IRC. Vanilla gets away from a lot of the complexity of other boards, yet it still keeps its functionality.
The forum you listed just feels a bit like a guestbook.
This is a further explanation of shii's viewpoint
Your whole concept is based off anonmyity and how that is a good thing. Well, it might be a good thing for you, and it might even be a good thing for the Japanese, but Americans/Westerners tend to be much more individualistic. I don't want to sit there and anonymously post comments and never get recognized for them being mine.
I respect your opinion, I just don't think you understand that the vast majority of Westerners WOULD NOT enjoy such a board as you are linking.
I would do something about it, but these forums don't get that much traffic relatively.