HackerOne users: Testing against this community violates our program's Terms of Service and will result in your bounty being denied.
Search
-
Re: Vanilla 2.3 beta
although not as lenient but you might consider... require php 5.6 - you would actually help clients since 5.4 and 5.5 are unsupported. http://php.net/supported-versions.php and require rewrite urls and put the info in a clear read me about changing .htacccess and include an nginx config or at least a sample for rewriting… -
Re: Skyrocketing Bounce Rate
If you are going to post about problems. you will go round and round. it works. it doesn't work. * 1 you need to specify if your forum is embedded or not. - usually more problems occur if forum is embedded. * 2 you need to specify your OS, your web server type, and your version of php. * 3 you also need to test with no… -
Re: [SOLVED] Installing Vanilla 2.1b3 on a non-internet connected server.
I resolved it. my issue was this. Q. Can you install by copying the version 2.1b3 vanilla-core zip file via a jump drive to a server that in not connected to the internet I unzipped, and installed files and directories and created database. ran the install.... initially I couldn't get to the dashboard or signout after the… -
Several Places where I think a config statement option would be valuable.
This was discussed in previous discussions, but I thought I might summarize and add to at a later date. * A config statement to allow disabling of logging. http://vanillaforums.org/discussion/comment/171086/#Comment_171086 value - cut down on size and maintenance of edit/delete log purging. * A config statement to allow… -
Re: Vanilla 1.5.1 How to change sign in url
maybe, maybe not. since you are using vanilla 1.5.1 (I don't think anyone would jump on you for changing the core files, since you probably did, other wise you would have upgraded). :grin: conversely if it is broke (and may have security issues), upgrade it. even more curious, if the signin url doesn't work, how could… -
Re: Any chance this plugin will be updated to support 2.1 / 2.2?
@nicocizik nice fix for the settings, unfortunately people might unwittingly use it before it is completely fixed .... there are more insidious issues ..... potential security problems, missing features, and potential clashes with other plugins. one should change all the views as well to be compliant with 2.1 or 2.2. it is… -
Re: Allow users to title private messages and remove users from the thread
You would need to start a new conversation with the participants you want included. I don't believe there is a way to ignore the user just per conversation, and there is no way to prevent them from receiving messages if they are already included. The user themselves can delete themselves from the conversation and will no… -
Re: Vanilla 2.6 is coming! Are you ready?
Probably be better to get a trusted volunteer to upload fixes to an authors plugin, if the author agrees. there are moderators here, there are admins, there could be a plugin fixer. Some fixes of plugins are already provided but the author doesn't have the 5 minutes to upload the fixes to the plugin and update the plugin… -
Re: Roadmap discussion for Vanilla 2017
> I'll do my best to provide constructive ffedback. I like best this option: a 2.4 release cycle immediately (without the native API) while api could be great, the other functionality in 2.4 and bug fixes, core plugins would be nice to get out in a timely manner, since as you say now is the optimal time to start a release…
39 results