Blog Documentation Book a Demo
Vanilla 1 is no longer supported or maintained. If you need a copy, you can get it here.
HackerOne users: Testing against this community violates our program's Terms of Service and will result in your bounty being denied.

Swear Filtering Extension

2

Comments

  • lechlech ✭
    Only when used in some expressive context do I think swearing is acceptable. In cases of suprise or disappointment, it's quite alright. When it's aimed at causing emotional harm, or as a threat, then it can be frowned upon. Quite frankly tho, I just don't give a damn.
  • chimairachimaira
    I would only use it so that I can read the forums at school. I don't mind if certain words aren't filtered, or people swear in other ways as long as I can view it without the filter picking it up. Swearing doesn't bother me in the slightest (when used in a casual sense, and not used in an abusive and threatening way).
  • 3stripe3stripe ✭✭
    scunthorpe!
  • gigingergiginger New
    edited January 2006
    Swearing is the linguistic crutch of the inarticulate motherfucker. 3stripe: Was it the government that had a filter that stopped Scunthorpe being allowed in their e-mails?
  • lechlech ✭
    What the hell is Scunthorpe?
  • Elliott HirdElliott Hird
    ^ RUDE BOY!
  • gigingergiginger New
    edited January 2006
    lech: Scunthorpe
  • 3stripe3stripe ✭✭
    edited January 2006
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scunthorpe "It gained some internet notoriety in 1996 when AOL's obscenity filter (among others) refused to accept the name of the town, due to its inclusion of a character string which the filter rejected as obscene." Not sure what the government was that blocked it in their emails but I'm guessing Singapore?
  • Elliott HirdElliott Hird
    note: if you're an idiot look between s and h.
  • gigingergiginger New
    edited January 2006
    note: if you're rude then just throw insults around.
  • MinisweeperMinisweeper New
    edited January 2006
    ---
  • MinisweeperMinisweeper New
    Hmm, the html formatter lets you leave tags open. Thats fun.
  • BenBen
    edited January 2006
    Hmm, is it just me or is there something odd happening with the block comment feature? Try repeatedly blocking and unblocking mini's last post. Does anyone else get multiplying <strong> tags?
  • MinisweeperMinisweeper New
    haha. Yeah. The whole formatter is a bit fucked. I dunno where the spare strongs are coming from.
  • gigingergiginger New
    edited January 2006
    I've worked out where the bug was coming from anyway. I had <strong>note: <ins>if you're rude then just throw insults around.</ins></strong> I removed the ins and the following text was no longer bold. edit: Put them in again to test and it was fine.... I clearly fucked up somewhere.
  • MinisweeperMinisweeper New
    Yeah. When i viewsource'd your comment it had two opening strong tags. But when i blocked it it was fine. How very odd indeed.
  • gigingergiginger New
    I blame Jesus.
  • BenBen
    edited January 2006
    Did Jesus exist? Italian court to decide
    "In my book, The Fable of Christ, I present proof Jesus did not exist as a historic figure.
    He must now refute this by showing proof of Christ's existence," Cascioli said.
  • gigingergiginger New
    hahahahahahaha
  • lechlech ✭
    ahh, I guess I didn't see what the problem was right away with that name and simply over-looked it all together. Gah, wake up early, read, come back and laugh at myself before sleep :P that's just silly.
This discussion has been closed.