Please upgrade here. These earlier versions are no longer being updated and have security issues.
HackerOne users: Testing against this community violates our program's Terms of Service and will result in your bounty being denied.

The growing issue of over simplification.

edited February 2011 in Vanilla 2.0 - 2.8
I wanted to start this discussion and test the waters out a little. I enjoy vanilla's approach to a simplistic Core install with plugin's as an option. But im seeing a common issue that ive experienced in other projects taking a similar approach that from my past experience needs to be addressed properly before it turns into a burden for our users and developers. I like to refer to it as over simplification. Where everything that is nothing is considered a plugin ultimately resulting in a large amount of plugins that users need and use. One way around this, is to have these plugins enabled by default. Which solves the problem temporarily, but when the numbers of plugins included in core continue to grow the support and updates for these plugins slow down because its created more work for a feature users have come to think of as a "Core feature".

The inclusion of a plugin being added to the project, how they are selected, why plugins are enabled by default should be documented and up for debate. Some plugins in my opinion need to make the move to being included in core as a feature and not a plugin. For example, i currently have 24 plugins installed, 11 enabled. I would like to see some statics of what the average amount of plugins installed is, how many enabled, what percentage of users are using the plugins included by default, and what the community thinks is a suitable number.


  • Options
    I agree with your analysis. This reminds me of how PunBB and FluxBB is over simplified as well. They say that PMs can't be added to the core and only as a mod because users should use emails instead.

    Add Pages to Vanilla with the Basic Pages app

  • Options
    I totally agree here.
    And you used the right word.
    Some plugins must be clearly moved into core (I mean Tagging, Gravatar and Voting, Maintance and Geisha Highlighter) with ability to disable visual part of them at any time.

    Having so many plugins also have impact on performance, both on server and user side.
    Loading 8-10 CSS files and 10 JS files is not good idea, especially if user just moved from search engine on from the link and do not have any cache working.

    For server side - we have some dirty hacks for Gravatar to substitute Avatar photo URL insted of hard writing it in time of each Profile change. Same goes for any html formatting plugins working on the fly today.

    Tagging being real catching feature of Vanilla is still plugin and speaking of Tagging Enchanced, of quite bad quality, with errors in code.

    Plugins also have bad habit of adding JS files to Controller and using them on all views for this controller. I think that Controller must be improved, so plugin could specify exact views and extra arguments that are required to include this JS or CSS file.

    May be we need special fork for owners of medium and large sites, introducing some performance related changes and moving some functionality into the core.
  • Options
    edited February 2011
    I think Vanilla should have on it core/default :

    1. Role title/User title... better if there is Badge or Stars too.
    2. Thread Rating
    3. Who Is Online
    4. Quotes and [code] tag for technicaly community.
    5. Bad Words Filter

    Please dont be too simple... You forget standard feature in common forums software.

  • Options
    1. Role title/User title... better if there is Badge or Stars too. (so some kind of ranks system, look at the profile page and the roles you see there)

    2. Thread Rating (Voting plugin? What do you think the 0 and the up / down button besides a thread mean)

    3. Who Is Online (Yes or No, are we a forum or a CMS?)

    4. Quotes and [code] tag for technicaly community. (Yes, but it's already possible (hidden feature)

    5. Bad Words Filter (There is a plugin for it, but yes, should be with core by default)

    Please dont be too simple... You forget standard feature in common forums software.You are absolutely right. There's 1 problem. The common forums got too bloated with features, so there must be some choices made somewhere down the line...

    There was an error rendering this rich post.

  • Options
    Again, it is bad fallance that minimim is right.
    Yes, current approach in Vanilla is certainly much better than many others.
    But.. Some parts much be moved to core.


    I think that you wrongly interpreted almost all points made by @n4is3n.
    We really do not have working roles (only half baked plugins that do not work) with rules how they are assigned. And all else also.
  • Options
    Ok, so how should I have interpreted n4is3n's list then. New plugins?
    Improved current plugins?

    There was an error rendering this rich post.

  • Options
    edited February 2011
    Thanks UnderDog

    No no... i mean,

    1. user title, in every post... not only at profile. Stars rank or badges would be better. So we know, "who" or "what".

    2. Thread rating by default, not plugin.

    3. "Who is online" is default feature in common forum software... not portal CMS as you say. Usually at bottom of forum.

    4 & 5. I'm happy you say that... Can't wait for next release, :)

    Sorry, my English is bad... I hope you understood what i mean.
  • Options
    aeryaery Gtricks Forum in 2.2 :) ✭✭✭
    I strongly agree for User ranks or badges. This would encourage other users too.

    There was an error rendering this rich post.

  • Options
    renerene New
    edited February 2011
    I disagree. All of n4is3n's suggestions are not important to me or my users. My users don't care about roles, ratings or tagging. They just want a simple forum that they can understand.

    Each forum has a different user group with different requirements. So i think it's important to keep the core to it's bare necessities and leave the featurecreeping to the plugin developers. ;)
  • Options
    ShadowdareShadowdare r_j MVP
    edited February 2011
    I once had a user who cared only about his rating. He wanted more stars and I said that's for other usergroups only and that he had to post more to gain more stars. Seems like he left because he didn't get his stars. User ranks aren't really important since you can go to the user's profile and see if they're a moderator or not and there is a flagging option as well.

    Add Pages to Vanilla with the Basic Pages app

  • Options
    Agree with aery... user rank will encourage user to be more active, not only come to ask, then after it disappeared.


    And your forum will be hard to be huge. Because of its limitations... ;-)
    3rd party developer is can not be fully trusted. I hate the words "Use at your own risk".
  • Options
    What if we:
    Make a package with the desired plugins, but you can of course disable the plugins if you don't want them in there?

    Or we make a package with plugins on top of the bare core?

    That package could then contain the necessary plugins like tagging, ranks and "who's online".

    There was an error rendering this rich post.

  • Options
    I think that we need separate fork oriented at larger forums and with necessary functionality in core (not plugins) and all possible optimizations also.
  • Options
    Forking IMO would make things worse, more work with two branches to support, different feature sets etc etc. Vanilla forums should work and be compelling to users of many needs. It Should be capable of supporting a small basic forum, or a large forum. Plugins solve this issue.

    I somewhat agree with you. And i prefer the stance that vanilla forums has taken in regards to simplicity. Its the process of core feature/plugin inclusion and the growing number of plugins needed to operate a basic forum that is bothersome. As others have pointed out there may be performance issues in coloration with the over simplification, and personally i find it to be a nuance.

    I think that statistics should play a large role in this process. If 80 percent of vanilla installs have "whos online" enabled, then this obviously needs to be a plugin included in core and possibly considered for the change to becoming a core feature.

    Another thought to throw into the mix. Applications. If one was to have two vanilla based apps installed, each with their own plugins, the number of plugins again is increasing. We are going to need a plugin to Maintain the mass amount of plugins ...

  • Options
    I don't see how this can be worse, as current state of development is aimed an minimim functionality small forums.
    Some features must be added for larges installations accroding to core developers, but we don't know that exactly.
  • Options
    i like having options
  • Options
    If I may be honest, most of the plugins that exist at the "addons" are plugins that are very standard. Addons such as "Who is online", "voting", "quotes", Is a standard feature that we usually meet in the other forum software, nothing special... But in vanilla, wow... Its Popular! ;-)

    Actually I hope that vanilla has plugins that much more functional (of course as options), to support a larger complex forum, not only for small community. Because I'm sure everyone wants their community to grow big. And encourage plugin developers to be more creative.
  • Options
    Genearally, as vanilla will be more functional an optimized for medium to alrge communities, we'll see much more serious plugins. As many of such communities can invest time and money for making features.
  • Options
    I am glad vanilla is a simple and easy to use forum software. It's just (once again) too simple. I think this site agree with me :

    Vanilla does not have to follow the trend of other forums out there. Some features are not very important (maybe) like :

    - signature
    - IM
    - complex profile layout
    - Top poster, etc...

    The things above are not necessary for the vanilla, because it is not really important (in my opinion).

    But it's just a few features that should exist by DEFAULT,

    - thread rating (so we know how important/popular the thread).
    - user rank / stars / badges (we know what and who).
    - Quotes and code tags
    - Who is online

    I hope this can be a constructive suggestion for future release... :-)
  • Options
    Who is online can make performance hit for medium and large communities.

    Btw, many vBulletin guys use famous "10 minutes in the past" approach for guests, serving them only cached pages.
Sign In or Register to comment.