HackerOne users: Testing against this community violates our program's Terms of Service and will result in your bounty being denied.
Running a successful Vanilla forum with 3500+ members.. any questions?
Hey guys, I started a forum back in 2006 for the student's at my university and it has remained fairly popular over the years, even after the spread of Facebook. It has about 3500 members, and gets about 200 visitors per day. It is fully automated, other than the fact that I have to approve new members manually due to spam. Anonymous posting is allowed with the recaptcha and all new posts are automatically posted to the twitter account as a way to retain traffic and bring in new visitors.
I know it's hard to launch a forum and develop a new community, so if you guys want to pick my brain (especially about the early stages) feel free to ask. I have learned a lot of things over the years about what to do and what not to do. From my experience, Vanilla is the best forum option out there hands down and I'm very glad that I switched 2 years ago.
http://talksfu.ca
I know it's hard to launch a forum and develop a new community, so if you guys want to pick my brain (especially about the early stages) feel free to ask. I have learned a lot of things over the years about what to do and what not to do. From my experience, Vanilla is the best forum option out there hands down and I'm very glad that I switched 2 years ago.
5
Comments
Did you simply let membership pick up, or did you post your own articles, get you friends to post Q and A, etc?
For me the site is more of a niche interest, which is different than a student union. But still quite popular. I've already ripped articles from my blog in an SEO friendly way excerpts, I will encourage club members' to post Q and A. I'm also going to invite bloggers, give them extra publicity, it would use a similar feed reading technique that I also use. I'm also going to invite some other struggling forum to join forces, as they don't have to technical knowledge.
Other than if necessary that I'm thinking ripping (public) Q and A from, the web. However this has to be done well, in a way that is not dishonest, but also doesn't make a big deal out of it Archives bot or something (they would be hand selected). Early archives 2000-2005 from marginal sites would make sense.
To be honest I have seen some pretty clueless people do well at forums. Sometimes it is simply about timing and luck. The guy I'm thinking of there was nothing out there at the time. But atm he has completely botched his site he is not competent enough to fix it. He calls himself a developer, but he can't tie his shoe laces in that respect. He had help in he beginning, but claimed all the credit and pissed off the other founders. Now he is too scared to migrate, and refuses help from anyone. His site is regularly down, becuase it can't handle the load, and he won't make efficiencies. The only thing he has done is purchase physical server.
grep is your friend.
My site is very tag focused. I'm not going to discuss all the details but it is simple, but with custom functionality under the hood.
grep is your friend.
1. How do you spread the word about your community?
2. What are the most common questions from new users about the community?
3. How do you deal with abusive people/trolls?
4. My Dad's a UBC graduate. Do you hate him?
1. How do you get it to send new posts to your twitter account?
Great idea for a post, btw! -bookmarked-
1. initially i spread it by dropping flyers around campus, and optimizing my forum for the keyword "sfu forum".. once ppl started using the forum and creating threads, those threads got indexed in google and the long tail started bringing in traffic (as well as word of mouth). right now, a majority of traffic comes from google simply by people typing in specific questions that have already been indexed on my forum
2. the most common questions are regarding academic things such as which classes to take, or which professors are easy/hard. no one really asks anything about the community itself, it is self explanatory
3. i have installed a plugin which gives forum regulars the ability to flag inappropriate posts. these posts show up in the vanilla dashboard and then we simply go through and delete them. also i have a team of volunteer moderators who help keep things clean (we have a zero tolerance policy for trolls)
4. no, i love ubc. i wish i had gone there instead of sfu but it was too far from my house to drive everyday
http://twitterfeed.com/
What I actually did was create multiple users with a variety of usernames and display pics. Then i just searched on other student forums to find topics that I thought would be relevant to students at my school as well (general topics like about relationships and tips to do well in classes, that sort of thing). Then I recreated those discussions on my forum. At the same time, I was spreading the word around school about the new forum.
Once people started using it, I didn't need to create discussions myself anymore and people did it for me. Once that critical mass was reached, it basically snowballed on its own. The more discussions that people were having on the site, the more it was being indexed in google, and the more new visitors were coming to the site.
grep is your friend.
I'm wondering if it was because you did the import before we refined the process. We've seen two major things that have hurt SEO after an import.
1. We initially had 302 redirects instead of 301 redirects. It turns out that Google gets annoyed if you keep giving it the same 302 over and over again. This has since been fixed.
2. We had a client that completely changed domains and was forwarding all traffic from the old domain to the home page of the new site rather than the individual content pages. This killed the SEO.
3. Again, if you change domains and not just products you may need to put a site verifier into your new site. If you have Google Analytics on your old site and properly move it to the new domain then you should be good.
When we did Penny Arcade's forum we made sure the redirects were in place correctly and saw no drop off in search traffic.