In discussion view hide panel, etc

422

In thread discussion view.

I want to do this.

Panel {display:none;}

Content {width:100%;}

I was hoping to use body id to trigger this, just for this page, but unable to as the id is same as index.

Any ideas.

peregrine

in a specific discussion or in all threaded discussions.

422

all discussions not sure what the difference is to threaded discusions

vrijvlinder

yes you can I did it , using

body.Vanilla.Discussion.Index #Content{width:100%;}

body.Vanilla.Discussion.Index #Panel{display:none;}

422

hmmm.

nope as stated in original post the id for body is same as discussions.

< body id="index-page" class="in_unknown">

i am using 2.0.18.1

vrijvlinder

i am using 2.1.18.1

oh , sorry then never mind I have not hacked that one yet, maybe I should start to ...

peregrine

@vrijvlinder is correct.

@422

all discussions not sure what the difference is to threaded discusions

I was hoping to use body id to trigger this, just for this page, but unable to as the id is same as index.

your questions was unclear to me so I pselled it out.

because discussion topics is

body.Vanilla.Discussions. .....

and

individual discussions are

body.Vanilla.Discussion. .....

different ids

422

not on mine they aint lol. Me tinks I need to investigate further

peregrine

2.0.18.4

vanilla_discussions_index

vanilla_discussion_index

422

to add, durrhhh

This is heavily modified forum integrated not embedded within our site. Using sso.
I am wondering if theres a way of adding id to the body tag targetted for this page.

Via say addclass ( addid ) lol

peregrine

try adding this to your custom css (it works for me in default vanilla theme).

body.Discussion #Content {
width:100%;

}

body.Discussion #Panel {
width:100%;
}

422

Ok just checked a 2.0.18.1 and 2.0.18.4

In the former I have in default.master.php

< body id="Body">

in the latter I have

< body id="<?php echo $BodyIdentifier; ?>" class="<?php echo $this->CssClass; ?>">

I think we may have removed the bloody body tag php code, when we sliced the forum up. Will carry on checking

vrijvlinder

@peregrine said:
vrjvlinder was almost right

2.0.18.4

vanilla_discussions_index

vanilla_discussion_index

those are the ID, I gave the class, you can also use

body#vanilla_discussion_index.Vanilla.Discussion.Index

but Kasper told me a while back that was overkill so I just use the body class now

however I am not very familiar yet with the 2.1 changes they should not be that different

422

@vrijvlinder you cannot target a class attribute to an id that is the same across all pages, which is the issue. If the ID changed the solution is simple.

peregrine

I edited my comment. It takes longer for processing when you specify more attributes but if you have to isolate - you have to. whatever works. ID would be quicker than class I would think because by default id can only occur once whereas class can be multiple.

in the end it was confusion because 422 failed to mention the version originally

422

solved it, fgs in our global header we had changed the id structure.

Solved

vrijvlinder

Using my method,in 2.0, only the discussion page where you view the thread gets changed, but you must use important on it. The other index pages remain the same.

body#vanilla_discussion_index.Vanilla.Discussion.Index #Content

body#vanilla_discussions_index.Vanilla.Discussions.index #Content

this would only affect the discussion list

422

LOL @peregrine

Actually versioning isnt the issue here, just good old honest stupididy.

We had replaced our body id, with our own code within global headers.

422

@vrijvlinder said:
Using my method,in 2.0, only the discussion page where you view the thread gets changed, but you must use important on it. The other index pages remain the same.

body#vanilla_discussion_index.Vanilla.Discussion.Index #Content

body#vanilla_discussions_index.Vanilla.Discussions.index #Content

this would only affect the discussion list

Thats not a good way of doing it, mixing multiple ID's within a reference chain is bad practice.

Thanks, but I think you may have missed the issue, whilst your answer would be helpful for those who indeed possessed a body id of any sort, for me i didnt have one.

vrijvlinder

I thought I was on another planet for a moment lol jet lag

peregrine

@422

I understood you more and more as the conversation progressed.

somewhat comprehensible ----> crystal clear

me and v we like to wrestle over ideas.