Vanilla 1 is no longer supported or maintained. If you need a copy, you can get it here.
HackerOne users: Testing against this community violates our program's Terms of Service and will result in your bounty being denied.
vanilla blog
first, a disclaimer: i have a habit of pushing things much further than they were ever originally intended to go. i like to find the limitations of things.
years ago, when livejournal first debuted, i was always wondering if it would be feasable to use the same software (with a little tweaking) to do two similar but distinct functions: first, it would be a forum, with all that goes along with that. second, it could be a journaling/blogging software with comments built in.
when i originally thought this up, i figured it would really just be a matter of style and arrangement, with only a few minor things required.
in case you haven't realised this yet, this is totally just brainstorming, and i fully expect this to never happen.
so you've got a vanilla installation, and user billy would have the option to create a journal for himself. all this journal really is, though, is a collection of threads - discussions - that are "administered" by billy. he controls the visibility and permissions, whether people can reply or comment on his entries, and what the default style of his pages is. of course, these discussions wouldn't be displayed in any sort of view from the forum side of things.
i would imagine this is all possible with some extensions and cleverness. vanilla has much better support for options in the database than our user management system did, because ours required a new column for each new option.
alrighty, brainstorming mode off. feel free to tear my ideas apart.
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
How Vanilla builds pages
I'd be glad to toss them your way.
@stuart
The problem with asking people to pay for software is that they expect support. And I'm sure mark can't support it, not all by himself. But people will expect support whether they pay $1 or $100. And that sucks.
No. I think that once the vanilla core is settled into 1.0, we should start taking it apart and putting it back together to make some blog software. I've got various html_template code lying around, that I can use (when I wrote my own photo thing, I wrote like 5 different html template classes). We've got an awesome user/and interface engine here for the backend. it'd simply be a matter of extended it a little bit (I think). and putting together some of the parts differently.
I think Mark would be happy to help us learn the code, but certainly I don't think he has the time or the energy right now to write the code himself.
minimaleasy to write. The only major obstacle is locking starting discussions in certain categories to certain roles, and then you just make a category named "blog" and only let whoever you want blogging to start em. After that, anyone can respond, and hey presto, you have a blog. Just pull out all blog posts and slap em on a front page.Of course, that wouldn't provide the multiple classification tagging that we've grown so used to with blogs, but, is it absolutely necessary? And to be honest, I'd love to see a feature like multiple tagging used in Vanilla anyway, sort of as a social experiment to see how it works!
I would definitely prefer tagging. The other thing I'd like to do is create more options for roles for finer grained control.
In my opinion, the trick with any blog is the output. I think Vanilla would make an awesome backend, but I want to be able to style my output completely with the help of templates. I'd prefer if vanilla wasn't the front end as well (if you kind of get what I'm talking about).
that make sense?
actually punbb has this and i thought it was pretty cool. check punbb.org's front page.
I.E. Move it towards blogging, rather than have blogging me a forum. get my drift?