Vanilla 1 is no longer supported or maintained. If you need a copy, you can get it here.
HackerOne users: Testing against this community violates our program's Terms of Service and will result in your bounty being denied.

Nice work Mark!

2

Comments

  • MarkMark Vanilla Staff
    Stash: By that logic, if someone wanted to bump their extension to the top of the list, they could always just change their version number to something and then change it back to what it was.

    I'm honestly not concerned about abuse. I figure people just want to help others with their extension - they don't want to shove it down their throats. But maybe that's naive of me.

    Either way, I think you're right that it should only be updated if the version changes or a new file is uploaded... I'll make that happen now.
  • StashStash
    edited March 2007
    Yeah, I realised they could abuse it like that just after I posted, but they're less likely too as it would end up looking silly and really piss people off using their extensions as they'd constantly be being told to update :P

    I also agree that most extension authors just want to help people, but I'm still glad you made the change as there's always at least one arsehole out there ;)
  • MarkMark Vanilla Staff
    hehe - okay, that change has been committed.
  • If we make one person the designated arsehole but then secretly tell them to be nice then we could solve all the problems?
  • The Add-ons Show All page is unreadable in Safari...
    http://lussumo.com/addons/index.php?PostBackAction=Search&Sort=Recent

    ...all the DIVs display chopped off and overlapped!

    Also same problem with the Recent Add-ons page...
    http://lussumo.com/addons/

    Posted: Saturday, 3 March 2007 at 12:23PM (AEDT)

  • edited March 2007
    Comment on the addon pages are not editable. I have to now find the discussion in the main forum and edit it there
    very annoying.
    How about issue solved feature. If an issue on the support thread is solved, I can click a link and have a text displayed "This issue has been solved" So other people reading it and having problem will know that the problem is solved. It should be similar to the Thank you extension. which u said u would add . :P
  • Just out of interest, is this allowed or frowned upon?

    [-Stash-] hopes he isn't now the designated arsehole...

  • Stash it looks like u fit the bill of one.
    the description page is way tooo detailed.
    All u need is tell people what it does. If they like it then they can go ahead and read the readme.txt for further instructions.

    I like the fact that u have clearly listed the dependencies
  • actually, i would beg to differ, i reckon that that description is pretty good. Although i think that the installation information at the bottom of the page should be instead clearly linked somewhere else on the page to the video tutorials. Otherwise it's excellent that you have clearly stated dependencies, given another screen shot and explained carefully what it's all about
  • Hmm... nicely divided... thanks guys ;) More opinions please :)
  • MarkMark Vanilla Staff
    Dammit - when the site worked in both ie and ff so quickly, I just assumed it would also work in safari. Silly me.

    Where are the Safari pros? Anyone care to shed some light? Is that an easy fix or a hard one? I get the feeling it would be a one-line fix.
  • MarkMark Vanilla Staff
    Okay - fixed the bug that prevented you from editing your comments via the add-ons site.
  • I think its an easy (non) fix. That is very similar to how it looked in FF before the hard refresh. I took a peek in Konqueror and it looks fine.
  • It's definitely a CSS issue, I'm not good with raw CSS code but there are gurus here that are.

    Posted: Saturday, 3 March 2007 at 4:09PM (AEDT)

  • MarkMark Vanilla Staff
    Uhhh. I just checked it in safari and it looks perfect. I'm using Safari 2.0.4 - what are you guys using?
  • Just did a forced refresh, it seems to be fixed now.
    Perfect indeed!

    Posted: Saturday, 3 March 2007 at 4:34PM (AEDT)

  • Mark I don't know if you missed this but the addons on the profile page show the ratings still.
  • Tbh I agree with Vincent about stash's description - particularly the dependencies bit. Maybe that should be a feature of the addons site, Mark, to make sure they get listed? There are a growing number of extensions which rely on others..
  • May I add one thing? When viewing an add-on's discussion, the thing which shows where the discussion is in just states the add-on's title. Shouldn't it be
    'Add-ons: Forced BBCode' rather than 'Forced BBCode', for example?

    Sorry for being so picky and thanks for this great update!
This discussion has been closed.