Best Of
Official releases have ended
The last official prebuilt release from Vanilla HQ that was well-tested was 4.0 RC1 in Jan 2021. No active developer from Vanilla has communicated here since 2021, nor any other staff member since Feb 2023. I departed Vanilla in Feb 2020 and am no longer active here.
A handful of community members periodically distribute newer builds using the raw source code. Those releases are in the Community Developer category and pinned at the top of main discussion list. Others have moved to Flarum.
Please exercise caution downloading zip files from discussions on this site, as anyone has the ability to post them! Check their post histories first. Good luck!
Developing a YouTube Playlist Embed Addon for Vanilla Forums
👋 Hello Vanilla Forums Developers,
I’ve been working on an idea to create a new addon for Vanilla Forums that would allow easy embedding of YouTube playlists directly into discussion threads and sidebars. The goal is to enhance user engagement by providing multimedia content that complements discussions and helps with learning.
Addon Features:
- Seamless Embedding: A simple way to embed YouTube playlists into posts using a custom BBCode or a plugin that adds an "Embed Playlist" button to the text editor.
- Customizable Display: Options for how the playlist appears, such as a compact view, full player, or a sidebar widget.
- Automatic Updates: The addon could automatically pull new videos into the playlist based on a YouTube channel or playlist ID, keeping the content fresh without manual updates.
Development Plan:
- Phase 1: Basic functionality with manual playlist embedding.
- Phase 2: Integration with Vanilla's API for user-specific playlist suggestions based on forum activity.
- Phase 3: Advanced customization options and potential integration with third-party analytics.
Feedback Needed:
- Would this addon be useful for your forum?
- What features would you like to see in a YouTube playlist embed addon?
- Any challenges you foresee with embedding external content like this?
💬 I’d love to hear your thoughts! If there’s interest, I’m happy to collaborate or share the development progress with the community. Let’s make Vanilla Forums more dynamic together!
Re: Vanilla 4.0 RC1 is now available
... and it should not be on Softaculous:
This is an RC (release candidate). It is not intended for use in production environments. It is pre-release software. Install it in some kind of sandbox
People who need a one click installer are not the best software testers, I'd say.
And on the other hand, a company who wants to simplify the install process of a software shouldn't care for software that is announced not to be for production use.
Re: plugin for looking some prohibited words
https://open.vanillaforums.com/addon/browse/all/recent
Return "Page not found"
But take a look at
https://github.com/vanilla/vanilla/tree/master/plugins/CivilTongueEx
Built release/2024.004
https://github.com/vanilla/vanilla/tree/release/2024.004
To upgrate you have to desactivate reactions plugin.
Building a Release
Hello,
I think I'm closer to getting it.
When I get it I will publish each new version that they publish here in this forum. It's costing me my job.
I have this error when i try to do ./bin/release
Do you have any idea what could be wrong?
Thanks!
Re: Vanilla & Higher Logic - An Update!
I and many other said it from the beginning, Vanilla Corp. is digging it's grave. But they the fu** did know sooo much better all the years.
The Vanilla lead team was utterly shitty to it's most active members seeking to support.
The Vanilla dev team was mostly high-nosed and ignorant.
The Vanilla community tried to be helpful in their limited possibilities.
It's becoming clear that most of the people involved after Mark dealt absolutely unprofessionally with the community. It happened all in hindsight. Remember these "be happy that they OS it at all." comments – narf, I can only laugh at that. We the community built Vanilla to a good extend, but the Corp. was stupid enough to kill that richness month by month.
@Linc: It wouldn't needed a lot to give us a forum that's not hidden away from the main page, to give us more access to fix the addon repo (at least sort old extensions out), etc. this simple helping hands were just not given because of unprofessionalism of the acting people. Helping us a bit was not as "complicated".
Time to build a new frontend.
Re: Vanilla & Higher Logic - An Update!
Goes to show there is NOTHING corporate greed can't corrupt.
It's more complicated than that. In the end, taking the investment that spurred Vanilla 2 into life was the same force that doomed it as an open source project. If we're being honest, the open source project had been neglected since late 2014. Higher Logic simply bought Vanilla for its corporate customers & enterprise direction, which was a reasonable business choice. (Full disclosure: I held stock options in Vanilla so it directly benefited me.) The business model required to make money from small communities and open source software is many times more challenging than going for the large corporate customers, which is why Vanilla followed that course explicitly after 2014. The pressure to be able to return the investors' money led to following the less-risky strategy, which ultimately led to a buyout by a company with the same strategy.
It's an outcome that is probably more disappointing to me than anyone, but I at least witnessed many of choice made along the way that got us here, and I understand why it happened this way. It was less about amorphous "greed and corruption", and more about the natural outcome of operating in a system that only values control + financial outcomes. Each person individually can personally care about more, but the system will eat you in the end if you follow its rules.
With perfect hindsight, do I see how there could have been a different outcome? Sure. But at the time, the stress and risks involved drove the decisions and none of us had the experience to see another reliable path forward.
Anyway, I'm not trying to be an apologist for Higher Logic. It wouldn't cost them much to build a release and ship it. I just think no one cares enough to do it and there's little incentive to do so, while sales & marketing can come up with a whole list of reasonable-sounding concerns to not do it, which will dissuade casual interest in it from succeeding. You'd need a good plan & business justification to execute on it and I doubt anyone there has the combination of experience and belief required to do it.